生成式AI在教育中的应用

摘 要：过去两三年生成式人工智能（Generative Artificial Intelligence）的迭代几乎以月计，它进入教育领域后，带来的不只是工具层面的便利，更像一种会渗透进课程、课堂与评价的深层变量。本文想讨论的，正是这些变化如何落在具体教学环节中。个性化学习的适配、教学设计的优化、教学评价的升级，都是生成式AI较容易介入、也较值得审视的地方。再往深处看，数据如何参与教学决策，成本结构如何被重新配置，跨学科能力培养又为何可能获得体系化支撑，这些追问共同指向技术赋能教育的内在价值逻辑。问题于是不在于学校是否用上了某个新模型，而在于技术嵌入之后，教育的判断方式、资源分配方式和能力培养方式是否发生了实质变化。人机协同机制若能真正落地，教育效率和公平性的提升空间值得期待；但技术潜力的充分释放，取决于伦理框架、治理机制和社会共识能否协同跟上。

关键词：生成式人工智能；教育改革；教育发展

正文 

可下载并阅读全文PDF，请按照本文版权许可使用。
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

The Application of Generative AI in Education

Abstract: Over the past two to three years, generative artificial intelligence (Generative AI) has evolved at a pace measured almost in months. Since its introduction into the education sector, it has brought not merely convenience at the tool level, but has acted as a profound variable that permeates the curriculum, the classroom and assessment. This article aims to discuss precisely how these changes manifest in specific aspects of teaching. The adaptation of personalized learning, the optimization of instructional design and the enhancement of teaching assessment are all areas where generative AI can readily be integrated and which are particularly worthy of scrutiny. Looking deeper still, questions such as how data informs teaching decisions, how cost structures are reconfigured, and why the cultivation of interdisciplinary skills might receive systematic support all point collectively to the intrinsic value logic of technology-enabled education. The issue, therefore, is not whether schools have adopted a particular new model, but whether, following the integration of technology, there have been substantive changes in the ways education is assessed, resources are allocated, and skills are developed. If mechanisms for human–machine collaboration can be effectively implemented, there is considerable scope for improving educational efficiency and equity; however, the full realization of technology’s potential depends on whether ethical frameworks, governance mechanisms and social consensus can keep pace.

Keywords: Generative Artificial Intelligence; Educational Reform; Educational Development

参考文献

1. 郑炜君,虞沧.以人为本：促进可持续发展的教育——2016-2022年《全球教育监测报告》专题述评[J].广东开放大学学报,2023,32(02):9-15.
2. 黄荣怀.人工智能正加速教育变革：现实挑战与应对举措[J].中国教育学刊,2023,(06):26-33.
3. 杨欣.基于生成式人工智能的教育转型图景——ChatGPT究竟对教育意味着什么[J].中国电化教育,2023,(05):1-8+14.
4. 李艳燕,郑娅峰.生成式人工智能的教育应用[J].人民论坛,2023,(23):69-72.
5. 肖君,白庆春,陈沫,等.生成式人工智能赋能在线学习场景与实施路径[J].电化教育研究,2023,44(09):57-63+99.
6. 胡伟.人工智能何以赋能教师发展——教师人工智能素养的构成要素及生成路径[J].教师教育学报,2024,11(02):39-47.
7. 廖小芳.生成式评语反馈对学习成绩、动机和自我调节学习的影响研究[D].华中师范大学,2024.
8. 胡姣.大语言模型赋能数据驱动教学决策的模型构建与应用研究[D].华东师范大学,2024.
9. 卢宇,余京蕾,陈鹏鹤,等.生成式人工智能的教育应用与展望——以ChatGPT系统为例[J].中国远程教育,2023,43(04):24-31+51.
10. 董艳,陈辉.生成式人工智能赋能跨学科创新思维培养：内在机理与模式构建[J].现代教育技术,2024,34(04):5-15.
11. 柴莞庚.生成式人工智能对个人信息保护的挑战和应对[D].北京外国语大学,2024.
12. 翟荆瑞.生成式人工智能引发的异化现象和伦理风险研究[D].西北师范大学,2024.
13. 陈兵,董思琰.生成式人工智能的算法风险及治理基点[J].学习与实践,2023,(10):22-31.
14. 周洪宇,常顺利.生成式人工智能嵌入高等教育的未来图景、潜在风险及其治理[J].现代教育管理,2023,(11):1-12.