MOSP / 期刊 / 环球医学进展 / 2026年·第5卷·第1期
综述论文综述 · Review

高分辨率超声在浅表器官病变鉴别诊断中的应用研究

湖南航天医院超声科,湖南长沙

提交:2026-05-15修改:2026-06-16录用:2026-06-16出版:2026-06-18
环球医学进展 2026, 5(1), 5-13; https://doi.org/10.58244/glmedp.263912
课题资助:自筹经费。无利益冲突需要说明。

摘要:目的:探讨HRUS在浅表器官病变鉴别诊断中的应用价值、证据基础及临床局限。方法:以“高分辨率超声、浅表器官病变、甲状腺结节、乳腺病变、浅表淋巴结、涎腺肿瘤、软组织肿物、弹性成像、超声造影、人工智能”等为中文检索词,以“high-resolution ultrasound,superficial organ lesions,thyroid nodules,breast lesions,lymph nodes,salivary gland tumors,soft tissue masses,elastography,contrast-enhanced ultrasound,artificial intelligence”等为英文检索词,检索国内外指南、共识、综述及临床研究文献,围绕HRUS技术基础、器官应用、影像学比较、研究质量及局限性进行叙述性综述。结果:HRUS可较清晰地显示浅表病变的形态、边界、内部回声、钙化、血流及与周围组织关系,在甲状腺、乳腺、浅表淋巴结、涎腺及皮下软组织病变中均具有较高应用价值。联合弹性成像、超声造影及人工智能后,可在一定程度上提高风险分层和良恶性鉴别能力,但现有研究仍存在单中心研究较多、样本量差异较大、随访时间不足、操作者依赖性明显及参数标准不统一等问题。结论:HRUS是浅表器官病变首选或重要的一线影像学工具,但其诊断价值不应被简单等同于“单项超声征象判断”。未来需在规范扫查、统一报告、强化多模态联合和多中心验证的基础上,进一步明确HRUS在不同浅表器官疾病诊疗流程中的定位。

关键词:高分辨率超声;浅表器官病变;鉴别诊断


Application of High-Resolution Ultrasound in the Differential Diagnosis of Superficial Organ Lesions

Abstract: Objective: This paper explores the application value, evidence basis and clinical limitations of HRUS in the differential diagnosis of superficial organ lesions. Methods: Using “high-resolution ultrasound, superficial organ lesions, thyroid nodules, breast lesions, superficial lymph nodes, salivary gland tumors, soft tissue masses, elastography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, artificial intelligence” as Chinese search terms, and “high-resolution ultrasound, superficial organ lesions, thyroid nodules, breast lesions, lymph nodes, salivary gland tumors, soft tissue masses, elastography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, artificial intelligence” as English search terms, we retrieved domestic and foreign guidelines, consensus, reviews and clinical research literature. A narrative review was conducted focusing on the technical basis of HRUS, organ application, imaging comparison, research quality and limitations. Results: HRUS can clearly display the morphology, boundaries, internal echoes, calcification, blood flow and relationship with surrounding tissues of superficial lesions. It has high application value in thyroid, breast, superficial lymph nodes, salivary glands and subcutaneous soft tissue lesions. After combining with elastography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and artificial intelligence, the risk stratification and benign/malignant differentiation ability can be improved to a certain extent. However, the existing studies still have problems such as more single-center studies, large sample size differences, insufficient follow-up time, obvious operator dependence and inconsistent parameter standards. Conclusion: HRUS is the preferred or important first-line imaging tool for superficial organ lesions, but its diagnostic value should not be simply equated with “single ultrasound sign judgment”. In the future, based on standard scanning, unified reporting, strengthening multimodal combination and multi-center verification, the positioning of HRUS in the diagnosis and treatment process of different superficial organ diseases should be further clarified.

Keywords: High-resolution ultrasound; Superficial organ lesions; Differential diagnosis


正文

可下载并阅读全文PDF,请按照本文版权许可使用。
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.


参考文献 / References: 

  1. 国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2025年国民经济和社会发展统计公报:2026年2月28日[N]. 中国信息报, 2026-03-02(001).
  2. 孙可欣, 李荔, 王少明, 等. 2024年中国分地区恶性肿瘤流行情况分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2026, 48(3): 400-412.
  3. Thurstone F L, Melton H E. Biomedical ultrasonics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics and Control Instrumentation, 1970, IECI-17(2): 167-172.
  4. Lockwood G R, Turnbull D H, Christopher D A, et al. Beyond 30 MHz [applications of high-frequency ultrasound imaging][J]. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 1996, 15(6): 60-71.
  5. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, et al. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues[J]. Ultrasonic Imaging, 1991, 13(2): 111-134.
  6. Tessler F N, Middleton W D, Grant E G, et al. ACR thyroid imaging, reporting and data system (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS committee[J]. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2017, 14(5): 587-595.
  7. 中华医学会超声医学分会浅表器官和血管学组, 中国甲状腺与乳腺超声人工智能联盟. 2020甲状腺结节超声恶性危险分层中国指南:C-TIRADS[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2021, 30(3): 185-200.
  8. Haugen B R, Alexander E K, Bible K C, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. Thyroid, 2016, 26(1): 1-133.
  9. Russ G, Bonnema S J, Erdogan M F, et al. European Thyroid Association guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules in adults: the EU-TIRADS[J]. European Thyroid Journal, 2017, 6(5): 225-237.
  10. Park C S, Lee J H, Yim H W, et al. Observer agreement using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-ultrasound, first edition (2003)[J]. Korean Journal of Radiology, 2007, 8(5): 397-402.
  11. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: clinical applications[J]. Ultraschall in der Medizin, 2013, 34(3): 238-253.
  12. Barr R G, Nakashima K, Amy D, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 2: breast[J]. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2015, 41(5): 1148-1160.
  13. Barr R G. Foreword to the second set of WFUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography[J]. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2017, 43(1): 1-3.
  14. Sidhu P S, Cantisani V, Dietrich C F, et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations for the clinical practice of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in non-hepatic applications: update 2017 (short version)[J]. Ultraschall in der Medizin, 2018, 39(2): 154-180.
  15. 毕玉, 解翔, 彭梅, 等. C-TIRADS及其联合弹性成像对甲状腺结节的诊断价值[J]. 安徽医科大学学报, 2022, 57(8): 1309-1312.
  16. 黄瑞娟, 丛淑珍, 林振意, 等. 多模态超声成像用于TI-RADS 3~5类甲状腺结节的诊断价值[J]. 中国辐射卫生, 2024, 33(3): 346-352.
  17. Yoon J H, Lee H S, Kim E K, et al. Malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: comparison between the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and the 2014 American Thyroid Association management guidelines[J]. Radiology, 2016, 278(3): 917-924.
  18. 田双燕, 吕春菊, 时倩. 超声萤火虫成像联合剪切波弹性成像鉴别乳腺良恶性结节的应用价值[J]. 中国中西医结合影像学杂志, 2022, 20(6): 567-570.
  19. 王慧妍, 陆龙颖, 张和庆, 等. 超声多模态检查可提高对乳腺非肿块型病变的诊断效能[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2024, 55(5): 1240-1246.
  20. Catalano O, Fusco R, De Muzio F, et al. Recent advances in ultrasound breast imaging: from industry to clinical practice[J]. Diagnostics, 2023, 13(5): 980.
  21. Kristiansen M, Martiniussen M A, Larsen A S F. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast tumors: an initial experience[J]. Acta Radiologica Open, 2022, 11(4): 20584601221097458.
  22. 陆健斐, 卜锐, 刘小艳, 等. 常规超声与超声造影对甲状腺乳头状癌患者侧颈区淋巴结转移的术前诊断效能[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2022, 43(12): 75-80.
  23. 安改芳. 高频超声联合弹性成像在浅表淋巴结性质评估中的价值分析[J]. 中外医学研究, 2025, 23(20): 75-78. DOI: 10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2025.20.020.
  24. Ahuja A T, Ying M. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes[J]. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology, 2005, 184(5): 1691-1699.
  25. 曾小科, 王学梅, 陈治光, 等. 高频超声对腮腺良恶性肿瘤的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2022, 51(5): 474-477.
  26. Rogalska M, Antkowiak L, Kasperczuk A, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation between the most common benign parotid gland tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2022, 11(24): 7360.
  27. Wang J, Zhao Z, Wang X, et al. Diagnostic performance of elastosonography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant salivary gland tumors: a meta-analysis[J]. Frontiers in Oncology, 2022, 12: 954751.
  28. 李玉芹, 房艳, 张艳, 等. 超声助力式弹性成像联合声触诊组织量化技术对浅表软组织肿物的诊断价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(8): 13-16.
  29. Jacobson J A, Middleton W D, Allison S J, et al. Ultrasonography of superficial soft-tissue masses: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement[J]. Radiology, 2022, 304(1): 18-30.
  30. Griffith J F. Practical approach to ultrasound of soft tissue tumors and the added value of MRI: how I do it[J]. Journal of Ultrasonography, 2023, 23(95): e299-e312.
  31. 郭芳琪, 刘晟, 徐磊, 等. 基于AI-SONIC™ Thyroid 5.3.3.0的超声图像分析对甲状腺结节恶性风险的预测价值[J]. 海军军医大学学报, 2024, 45(1): 29-36.
  32. 陈蕊, 吴墅, 郭佳, 等. 超声人工智能辅助诊断系统在最大径≤2 cm的BI-RADS 4类乳腺结节诊断中的应用价值[J]. 海军军医大学学报, 2024, 45(5): 592-598.

CC BY 4.0
© 2026 作者版权所有。许可出版:澳门科学出版社(MOSP),中国澳门。本文为开放获取文章,依据知识共享署名(CC BY 4.0)许可协议的条款和条件分发。 © 2026 by the authors. Published by Macao Scientific Publishers (MOSP), Macao, China. This is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license.
免责声明: 本期刊所发表文章中的所有陈述、观点和数据均为作者和贡献者的个人观点,不代表澳门科学出版社及/或编辑的立场。澳门科学出版社及/或编辑不对文中提及的任何思想、方法、说明或产品所导致的人身或财产伤害承担责任。 Publisher's Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in this journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of MOSP and/or the editors. MOSP and/or the editors disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Submit Your Manuscript Now