搜索文章:
期刊:
主题:
栏目:名家讲坛
预上线
国家级课题

数字与智能时代的契机:计算人文艺术学科群

Opportunities in the Digital and Intelligent Era: Computational Humanities and Arts Disciplines


作者:王国燕*,韩景怡,郑颖
 苏州大学 江苏 苏州
*通信作者:王国燕;单位:苏州大学 江苏 苏州
科学与人文艺术, 2025, 2(2), 0-0;
提交日期 : 2025年07月21日 丨 录用日期 : 2025年07月27日
课题资助:本文系国家社科基金重大课题“欺骗性人工智能的信息传播、社会影响与风险治理研究”(编号:24&ZD184)成果
引用本文
摘 要:
数字与智能技术正在对人文学科产生着重要影响,技术与人文学科的深度融合催生了计算文学、计算艺术学、计算历史学以及计算哲学与伦理学等一系列新兴领域,为人文学科提供了快速且精准的实证研究手段,使之逐步具备了科学研究的特质,这在一定程度上赋予了人文研究以科学研究的特质,并促使了计算人文艺术学科群的诞生。然而作为颠覆现有范式的新方向,研究目前仍处在发展初期,存在技术粗结论浅的质疑、学界对量化人文研究存在分歧,以及对“技术决定论”和“后人类”未来存在争议。随着智能技术的不断进步以及与人文艺术学科之间不断深度对话,计算人文艺术学科群的蓬勃发展终将会成为数字与智能时代中充满创造性生机的重要趋势。
关键词:人文计算;人工智能;数字人文;计算人文艺术;数字时代
 
Abstract:
The convergence of technology and humanities has led to the emergence of innovative disciplines such as computational literature, computational art, computational history, computational politics, computational philosophy, and ethics.  The integration of empirical research methods in humanities and arts has enabled the field to conduct rapid and accurate studies, thereby endowing it with some of the characteristics of scientific inquiry. The entire group of computational humanities and arts The field of disciplines is in the process of formation. Nevertheless, as an emerging direction aiming to challenge the established paradigm, computational humanities and arts research remains in its nascent stages of development. It is questioned about shallow technical conclusions, differences in academic circles on quantitative humanities and arts, and controversies about "technological determinism" and the future of "posthuman". With the continuous advancement of intelligent technology and the continuous in-depth dialogue between humanities and arts disciplines, the vigorous development of computing humanities and arts disciplines will eventually be an important trend in the digital and intelligent era, which is full of creative vitality.
Keywords: Humanities computing, Artificial intelligence, Digital humanities, Computational arts and humanities (CAH), Digital era
 
--
此为预上线版本,正文内容请期待后续更新。

作 者 / Authors:

王国燕,苏州大学科技传播研究中心主任,传媒学院特聘教授,博士生导师,数字传播系主任。国家社科基金重大课题首席专家,世界科技传播学会(PCST)学术委员。江苏省首席科技传播专家,江苏省“青蓝工程”学术带头人,东吴智库研究员,兼任江苏省高校社科传播与应用基地主任,(中英美澳)科技传播国际联合实验室主任,中国科协国家科技传播中心-苏州大学联合科技传播研究基地主任。发表中英文核心期刊论文70余篇,包括在Science Communication,New Media & Society,Information Communication & Society,Public Understanding of Science,Science & Education,Science as Culture,Journal of Informetrics,Leonardo 等国际期刊发表20余篇SSCI、A&HCI论文。代表性学术贡献为:前沿科学可视化传播、欺骗性人工智能信息传播等。

韩景怡,苏州大学传媒学院硕士研究生,研究方向为科技新闻与传播。

郑    颖,苏州大学传媒学院硕士研究生,研究方向为科技新闻与传播。


参考文献 / References: 
  1. Laubichler M. D., et al. Computational History of Knowledge: Challenges and Opportunities [J]. Isis, 2019, 110 (3): 502-512
      
  2. 彭青龙,都兰兰主编.《数字人文导论》[M]. 上海:上海交通大学出版社,2024,3(1)
  3. Way T., Whidden S. A Parallel, Conjoined Approach to Interdisciplinary Computer Science Education [J]. The 2016 ACM Conference, 2016
  4. Wang Q. Distribution Features and Intellectual Structures of Digital Humanities: A Bibliometric Analysis [J]. Journal of Documentation, 2017, 74 (1): 223-246
  5. Rockwell G. Is Humanities Computing an Academic Discipline?[J]. Defining Digital Humanities, 1999: 13
  6. 彭青龙,都兰兰主编.《数字人文导论》[M]. 上海:上海交通大学出版社,2024,3(3)
  7. Busa R. The Annals of Humanities Computing: The Index Thomisticus [J]. Computers & the Humanities, 1980, 14 (2): 83-90
  8. Duro A. Humanities Computing Activities in Italy [J]. Computers and the Humanities, 1968, 3 (1): 49-52
  9. (美)安妮・伯迪克(Anne Burdick)等著;马林青,韩若画译.《数字人文:改变知识创新与分享的游戏规划》[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2018.(124)
  10. Hardesty W. H., Mann D. D. Literary and Linguistic Research: The Cambridge Symposium [J]. JSTOR, 1973
  11. 彭青龙,都兰兰主编.《数字人文导论》[M]. 上海:上海交通大学出版社,2024,3(3)
  12. Schreibman S., et al. The Digital Humanities and Humanities Computing: An Introduction [J]. A Companion to Digital Humanities, 2004: 288-290
  13. Wang Q. Distribution Features and Intellectual Structures of Digital Humanities: A Bibliometric Analysis [J]. Journal of Documentation, 2017, 74 (1): 223-246
  14. 彭青龙,都兰兰主编.《数字人文导论》[M]. 上海:上海交通大学出版社,2024,3(4)
  15. 王宁,走向数字人文的新阶段 [J]. 燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,18 (1)
  16. 李天,数字人文背景下的文学研究 —— 量化方法在中西文学研究中的比较 [J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,(5):153-162
  17. 陈静,“是什么” 与 “怎么办”——“定义数字人文” 研讨会综述 [J]. 数字人文研究,2021,1 (1):16-20
  18. 黄楠森主编,《人学词典》[M]. 中国国际广播出版社,1990:517
  19. 张光忠主编,社会科学学科辞典 [M]. 北京:中国青年出版社,1990:5
  20. Wang Q. Distribution Features and Intellectual Structures of Digital Humanities: A Bibliometric Analysis [J]. Journal of Documentation, 2017, 74 (1): 223-246
  21. Ide N., Walker D. Common Methodologies in Humanities Computing and Computational-Linguistics - Introduction [J]. Computers and the Humanities, 1992, 26 (5-6): 327-330. DOI:10.1007/bf00136978
  22. Michel J. B. et al. Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books [J]. Science, 2010, 331 (6014): 176-182. DOI:10.1126/science.1199644
  23. 郑永晓,加快 “数字化” 向 “数据化” 转变 ——“大数据”、“云计算” 理论与古典文学研究 [J]. 文学遗产,2014,(6):141-148
  24. Kaltenbrunner W. Scholarly Labour and Digital Collaboration in Literary Studies [J]. Social Epistemology, 2015, 29 (2): 207-233. DOI:10.1080/02691728.2014.907834
  25. 罗凤珠,引信息的 “术” 入文学的 “心”—— 谈情感计算和语义研究在文史领域的应用 (J). 文学遗产,2009,(1):138-141
  26. 胡阿祥著,魏晋本土文学地理研究 [M]. 南京:南京大学出版社,2001:序 1
  27. Antons D. et al. Computational Literature Reviews: Method, Algorithms, and Roadmap [J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2021, 26 (1): 109442812199123. DOI:10.1177/1094428121991230
  28. Mortenson M. J. and Vidgen R. A Computational Literature Review of the Technology Acceptance Model [J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2016, 36 (6): 1248-1259. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.07.007
  29. 郑永晓,加快 “数字化” 向 “数据化” 转变 ——“大数据”、“云计算” 理论与古典文学研究 [J]. 文学遗产,2014,(6):141-148
  30. Grayson S. et al. Discovering Structure in Social Networks of 19th Century Fiction [C]. Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science, 2016: 325-326. DOI:10.1145/2908131.2908196
  31. Raben J. Humanities Computing 25 Years Later [J]. Computers & the Humanities, 1991, 25 (6): 341-350
  32. 郭利敏,葛亮,刘悦如,卷积神经网络在古籍汉字识别中的应用实践 [J]. 图书馆论坛,2019,39 (10):142-148
  33. Michel J. B., Shen Y. K., Aiden A. P., et al. Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books [J]. Science, 2011, 331 (6014): 176-182. DOI:10.1126/science.1199644
  34. Reddy R, Stclair G. The Million Book Digital Library Project [C]//Computer Science Presentation, 2001
  35. Williford C., Henry C. H. One Culture. Computationally Intensive Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences [R]. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2012. DOI:10.5860/clir.pub151
  36. Adams B., Gahegan M. Exploratory Chronotopic Data Analysis [C]//International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Montreal, QC, Canada: Springer International Publishing, 2016: 243-258
  37. Schöch C., et al. Smart Modelling for Literary History [J]. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 2022, vol. 16, no. 1: 78-93. DOI:10.3366/ijhac.2022.0278
  38. Howe D. C. Creativity Support for Computational Literature [C]//Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, Berkeley, CA, USA: ACM, 2009: 205-210. DOI:10.1145/1640233.1640265
  39. Lomas A. On Hybrid Creativity [J]. Arts, 2018, 7 (3):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts7030025
  40. Edmonds E., Franco F. Systems Theory, Systems Art and the Computer: Ernest Edmonds Interviewed by Francesca Franco [J]. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 2017, 42 (1 - 2): 169 - 179. DOI:10.1080/03080188.2017.1297158
  41. Montagna L., et al. Assessment of the Panel Support of a Seventeenth-Century Dutch Painting by Clinical Multislice Computed Tomography [J]. Studies in Conservation, 2021, 66 (3): 174-181. DOI:10.1080/00393630.2020.1757881
  42. Zhang J., et al. A Novel Automatic Image Segmentation Method for Chinese Literati Paintings Using Multi-View Fuzzy Clustering Technology [J]. Multimedia Systems, 2020, 26 (1): 37-51. DOI:10.1007/s00530-019-00627-7
  43. Aristidou A., et al. Folk Dance Evaluation Using Laban Movement Analysis [J]. Acm Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 2015, 8 (4), doi:10.1145/2755566
  44. Wang G., et al. A Computational Study of Empty Space Ratios in Chinese Landscape Painting, 618–2011 [J]. Leonardo, 2021, 54 (1): 43-47. DOI:10.1162/leon_a_02105
  45. Fan Z. B., et al. A Comparative Study of Oil Paintings and Chinese Ink Paintings on Composition [J]. Visual Computer, 2023, 39 (1): 259-272. DOI:10.1007/s00371-022-02408-2
  46. Huang L. S., Song Y. Intangible Cultural Heritage Management Using Machine Learning Model: A Case Study of Northwest Folk Song Huaer [J]. Scientific Programming, 2022, 2022: 1-12. DOI:10.1155/2022/1383520
  47. Hua K. L., et al. Artist-Based Painting Classification Using Markov Random Fields with Convolution Neural Network [J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2020, 79 (17-18): 12635-12658. DOI:10.1007/s11042-019-08547-4
  48. Milani F., Fraternali P. A Dataset and a Convolutional Model for Iconography Classification in Paintings [J]. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 2021, 14 (4): 1-24. DOI:10.1145/3458885
  49. Zhang K. J., et al. Visual Knowledge Guided Intelligent Generation of Chinese Seal Carving [J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2022, 23 (9): 1386-1399. DOI:10.1631/fitee.2100094
  50. 付菲菲,多风格国画生成的神经网络方法,四川大学硕士论文,2021
  51. Tang C. W., et al. Exaggerated Portrait Caricatures Synthesis [J]. Information Sciences, 2019, 502: 363-375. DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2019.06.055
  52. Gibson A., Ermus C. The History of Science and the Science of History: Computational Methods, Algorithms, and the Future of the Field [J]. Isis, 2019, 110 (3): 555-566
  53. Zaagsma G. On Digital History [J]. BMGN-Low Countries Historical Review, 2013, 128 (4): 3-29
  54. Burton O. V. American Digital History [J]. Social Science Computer Review, 2005, 23 (2): 206-220. DOI:10.1177/0894439305276546
  55. Flis I. Digital Humanities as the Historian’s Trojan Horse: Response to Commentary in the Special Section on Digital History [J]. History of Psychology, 2018, 21 (4): 401-410. DOI:10.1037/hop0000113
  56. Nix A., Decker S. Using Digital Sources: The Future of Business History?[J]. Business History, 2021, 65 (5): 937-959. DOI:10.1080/00076791.2021.1926337
  57. Brotton J. Maps Online: Digital Historical Geographies [J]. Journal of Historical Geography,2014,43:169-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhg.2014.03.004
  58. 陈海珠,包平,创新人文研究范式的数字人文 —— 基于数字人文在史学研究领域应用渗透的文献考察 [J]. 图书馆理论与实践,2017,0 (3):11-16
  59. 李凡, GIS 在历史、文化地理学研究中的应用及展望 [J]. 地理与地理信息科学,2008,24 (1):21-2648
  60. 王秋云,我国古籍数字化的研究现状及发展趋势分析 [J]. 图书馆学研究,2021,(24):9-14
  61. 夏翠娟,中国历史地理数据在图书馆数字人文项目中的开放应用研究 [J]. 中国图书馆学报,2017,43 (2):40-53
  62. 牟振宇,数字历史的兴起:西方史学中的书写新趋势 [J]. 史学理论研究,2015,(3):74-81159
  63. Williford C., Henry C. One Culture: Computationally Intensive Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences [R]. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2012: 44. ISBN: 978-1-932326-40-6
  64. Samoilenko A., et al. (Don't) Mention the War: A Comparison of Wikipedia and Britannica Articles on National Histories [C]//Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference. New York: ACM, 2018: 843-852. DOI: 10.1145/3178876.3186132
  65. 潘威等,历史地理信息化与图情研究融合的必要性与可行性 —— 以 “数字历史黄河” 为中心的考察 [J]. 图书情报知识,2021,38 (3):50-60
  66. 陈海玉等,民间历史文献知识图谱构建 —— 以徽州文书为例 [J]. 图书馆论坛,2022,42 (11):141-150
  67. 彭博,数字人文视角下的网络文物信息资源知识图谱构建 [J]. 图书馆论坛,2023,43 (2):57-66
  68. Beavers A. F., Harrison C. D. Information-Theoretic Teleodynamics in Natural and Artificial Systems [C]//Zenil H. (Ed.) A Computable Universe: Understanding and Exploring Nature as Computation. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2012: 347-364. DOI: 10.1142/8306. ISBN: 978-981-4374-29-3
  69. Kirchner D., Benzmüller C., Zalta E. N. Computer Science and Metaphysics: A Cross-Fertilization [J]. Open Philosophy, 2019, 2 (1): 230-251. DOI: 10.1515/opphil-2019-0015. ISSN: 2543-8875
  70. 郝宁湘,计算哲学:21 世纪科学哲学的新趋向 [J]. 自然辩证法通讯,2003,25 (6):37-42
  71. Zenil H. Algorithmicity and Programmability in Natural Computing with the Game of Life as in Silico Case Study [J]. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 2015, 27 (1): 109-121. DOI: 10.1080/0952813X.2014.940686. ISSN: 0952-813X
  72. Magnani L. Conjectures and Manipulations. Computational Modeling and the Extra-Theoretical Dimension of Scientific Discovery [J]. Minds & Machines, 2004, 14 (4): 507-538. ISSN: 0924-6495
  73. Mayo-Wilson C, Zollman K J S. The Computational Philosophy: Simulation as a Core Philosophical Method [J]. Synthese, 2021, 199 (1-2): 3647-3673. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-020-02950-3. ISSN: 0039-7857
  74. Awad E, Dsouza S, Kim R, et al. The Moral Machine experiment [J]. Nature, 2018, 563 (7732): 59-64. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6. ISSN: 0028-0836
  75. Scheller S, Merdes C, Hartmann S. Computational modeling in philosophy: Introduction to a topical collection [J]. Synthese, 2022, 200 (2): 1-10. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-022-03481-9. ISSN: 0039-7857
  76. Moretti G, Sprugnoli R. Alcide: Extracting and visualising content from large document collections to support humanities studies [J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2016, 111: 100-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.08.003. ISSN: 0950-7051
  77. Busa R. The annals of humanities computing: The Index Thomisticus [J]. Computers & the Humanities, 1980, 14 (2): 83 - 90. DOI: 10.1007/BF01948183. ISSN: 0010-4818
  78. Wang Q. Distribution Features and Intellectual Structures of Digital Humanities: A Bibliometric Analysis [J]. Journal of Documentation, 2017, 74 (1): 223-246
  79. 戴安德,姜文涛,赵薇。数字人文作为一种方法:西方研究现状及展望 [J]. 山东社会科学,2016,(11):26-33
  80. Aiden E., Michel J.-B. Uncharted: Big Data as a Lens on Human Culture [M]. New York: Penguin, 2014. ISBN: 9780143124322
  81. Kirsch A. Technology Is Taking over English Departments [J]. New Republic, 2014 (2): 18-21. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-022-03481-9. ISSN: 0028-6583
  82. 蔡迎春,中美数字人文研究 “差异性” 的冷思考 [J]. 图书馆建设,2022, (6):100-111
  83. Priem K, Fendler L. Shifting Epistemologies for Discipline and Rigor in Educational Research: Challenges and Opportunities from Digital Humanities [J]. European Educational Research Journal, 2019, 18 (5): 689-708. DOI: 10.1177/1474904119879342. ISSN: 1474-9041
  84. Gibson A, Ermus C. The History of Science and the Science of History: Computational Methods, Algorithms, and the Future of the Field [J]. Isis, 2019, 110 (3): 555-566. DOI: 10.1086/704717. ISSN: 0021-1753
  85. 李天,数字人文背景下的文学研究 —— 量化方法在中西文学研究中的比较 [J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,(5):153-162
  86. Pacheco A. Digital Humanities or Humanities in Digital: Revisiting Scholarly Primitives [J]. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2022, 37 (4): 1043-1056. DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqac038. ISSN: 2055-7671
  87. Gibson A, Ermus C. The History of Science and the Science of History: Computational Methods, Algorithms, and the Future of the Field [J]. Isis, 2019, 110 (3): 555-566. DOI: 10.1086/704717. ISSN: 0021-1753
  88. Bostrom N. In Defense of Posthuman Dignity [J]. Bioethics, 2005, 19 (3): 202-214. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00486.x. ISSN: 0269-9702
  89. Braidotti R. A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities [J]. Theory, Culture & Society, 2019, 36 (6): 31-61. DOI: 10.1177/0263276418771486. ISSN: 0263-2764
  90. 朱彦明,后人类主义对教育的挑战与重塑 [J]. 南京社会科学,2018,0 (11):129-136
  91. 杨威,面向 “后人类” 未来的人类 —— 福山与斯蒂格勒的技术观述评 [J]. 山东社会科学,2021,(3):33-38
  92. Allington D, Brouillette S, Golumbia D. Neoliberal Tools (and Archives): A Political History of Digital Humanities [J]. Los Angeles Review of Books, 2016. DOI: 10.1515/9783110529817.001. ISSN: 2162-3282
由此登陆,开启投稿之旅: