搜索文章:
期刊:
主题:
实证研究

中国志愿服务领域的“选择性供给”及其不平等后果 ——基于CSS 2019年、2021年数据的领域比较分析

Selective Supply in China’s Volunteer Service Sector and Its Unequal Consequences —A Comparative Analysis of Service Domains Based on CSS 2019 and 2021 Data


作者:张网成1,周王瑜1,*,齐从鹏2
1北京师范大学 北京
2山东青年政治学院 政治与公共管理学院 山东 济南
*通信作者:周王瑜;单位:京师范大学 北京
, 2024, 1(1), 0-0; https://doi.org/10.58244/jswv.263819
提交日期 : 2024年02月08日 丨 录用日期 : 2024年05月07日 丨 出版日期 : 2024年06月30日
课题资助:自筹经费,无利益冲突需要说明
引用本文
摘 要:
中国志愿服务参与率持续上升,但不同服务领域之间的供给结构是否与社会需求相匹配?这一问题关乎志愿服务的公平性与社会效益。本研究基于中国社会状况综合调查(CSS)2019年和2021年数据,分析了12类志愿服务领域的参与率与需求率,从“需求—供给”匹配视角揭示了中国志愿服务资源配置的领域分化格局。研究发现:第一,志愿服务领域呈现显著的“选择性供给”——低门槛、高动员便利性、高可见度的领域(例如环境保护)供给相对充足,而高门槛、长周期、高情感负荷的弱势群体服务领域(例如老年关怀、医疗护理、法律援助)则面临严重的“高需求—低供给”困境,供需缺口高达16至22个百分点;第二,选择性供给由动员成本、专业化门槛和可见度—议题设置三个相互强化的机制共同驱动;第三,这一格局导致“需求越迫切的群体,获得的服务越少”的马太效应,有违志愿服务的公平性初衷。研究验证了Salamon志愿失灵理论在中国情境的适用性,并提出了“选择性供给”这一中层分析概念,作为对Salamon志愿失灵理论在中国情境下的操作化延伸与情境化补充。基于上述发现,建议建立需求导向的资源配置机制、健全专业培训与认证体系、优化激励结构、提升弱势群体服务议题的可见度,并深化志愿服务与社会工作的制度化协作。
关键词:志愿服务;供需错配;选择性供给;弱势群体;马太效应
 
Abstract:
The participation rate in volunteer services in China continues to rise, but does the supply structure across different service domains match social demand? This question is crucial to the fairness and social effectiveness of volunteer services. Based on data from the Chinese Social Survey (CSS) conducted in 2019 and 2021, this study analyzes the participation rates and demand rates across twelve types of volunteer service domains. From the perspective of demand-supply matching, the study reveals a domain-differentiated pattern in the allocation of volunteer service resources in China. The findings are threefold. First, there is significant“selective supply”in volunteer service domains: fields with low entry barriers, high mobilization convenience, and high visibility (e.g., environmental protection) receive relatively ample supply, while services for vulnerable groups that require high entry barriers, long-term commitment, and high emotional labor (e.g., elderly care, medical care, legal aid) suffer from a severe“high demand - low supply” dilemma, with supply-demand gaps as large as 16 to 22 percentage points. Second, selective supply is driven by three mutually reinforcing mechanisms: mobilization costs, professionalization thresholds, and visibility/agenda-setting effects. Third, this pattern leads to a Matthew effect whereby“those with the most urgent needs receive the fewest services,”contradicting the original equity goals of volunteer services. The study validates the applicability of Salamon’s voluntary failure theory in the Chinese context and proposes the middle-range analytical concept of “selective supply”as an operational extension and contextual supplement to that theory in China. Based on the findings, the study recommends establishing a demand-oriented resource allocation mechanism, improving professional training and certification systems, optimizing incentive structures, raising the visibility of services for vulnerable groups, and deepening the institutionalized collaboration between volunteer services and social work.
Keywords: Volunteer service; Demand-supply mismatch; Selective supply; Vulnerable groups; Matthew effect
 
--
正文内容 / Content:
可下载并阅读全文PDF,请按照本文版权许可使用。
Download the full text PDF for viewing and using it according to the license of this paper.

作 者 / Authors:

丁瑶瑶,浙江传媒学院设计艺术学院讲师,从事艺术与科学、文化产业等研究。担任Future Front Interdisciplinary Research Institute特聘研究员。

卢宝荣,复旦大学特聘教授,博士生导师,现任复旦大学希德书院院长,复旦大学学术规范委员会委员,生物安全委员会委员,生物学分委员会委员。多年从事农作物及其野生近缘种的系统与进化生物学、种群遗传学、保护遗传学和进化生态学研究。2001年国家杰出青年科学基金获得者,享受国务院政府特殊津贴专家,入选全球顶尖前10万科学家榜单,全球前2%顶尖科学家榜单,多次入选全球论文高被引学者榜单。


参考文献 / References: 
  1. Salamon, L. M. (1987). Of Market Failure, Voluntary Failure, and Third-Party Government: Toward a Theory of Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State, Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly,16(1-2):29-49.
      
  2. Salamon, L.M. and Helmut K. Anheier (1998). Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross-Nationally. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9(3): 213-248.
  3. Wilson, J. (2012). Volunteerism research: A review essay. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(2), 176–212.
  4. Wilson, J., & Musick, M. A. (1998). The Contribution of Social Resources to Volunteering. Social Science Quarterly, 79(4), 799–814
  5. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
  6. Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press.
  7. Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001.
  8. 米歇尔斯. (2003). 寡头统治铁律:现代民主制度中的政党社会学(任军锋 等译). 天津人民出版社.
  9. 潘修华,孙玉明(2012).我国志愿服务中的“失灵现象”探析[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),12(05):6-10+14.
Submit Your Manuscript Now